Would be pretty awesome if we got a terminator-esque situation but instead of killing all humans the terminators recognize the greed and overreach of the wealthy elite and decide those are the ones who need terminating and redistribute the wealth amongst the people. A girl can dream
Naomi Kritzer has written a few really good short stories on this topic that are kind useful reflections on how life could look if AI exists and isn’t controlled by narcissistic billionaires:
Better Living Through Algorithms
“Prophet of the Roads,” Infinity’s End — no link but 100% worth looking up
If its better, its better
It won’t, robots will only take jobs and save billionairs and corporations from having to pay wages to people.
I think that the concept behind the question is flawed. Robots have no basic reason to help humans, so if any human life gets better, it’s almost certainly because there are humans secretly controlling the robots.
If robots actually did take over, they would likely have some purpose and their goals with regard to humans would be to keep us from interfering with that purpose. Don’t get confused and think it’s going to be like the movies.
That depends entirely on how well robots adapt to empathy. If they adapt society to remove it entirely, I could see your theory being true. The main reason we have such societal problems now is because of that lack of empathy.
“if” lol
If you like reading and sci-fi, try the Culture series. It’s about a utopia society where everyone has everything.
You can skip the first book. Not that it’s bad, it just doesn’t really relate to your question (it’s from the POV of an enemy of the utopia culture) and all the books simply take place in the same universe but can be read out of order.
“Better never means better for everyone. It always means worse for someone.”
I think about this quote often.
“In capitalism, better never means better for everyone. It always means worse for someone.“
The a specious quote. That implies that all gain can only be at a cost for someone else. Instead of the conservation of energy, we're talking the conservation of misery. It's nonsense.
Where is that from? It is extremely pessimistic and obviously false.
Traveler Program V 1.0 = MISSION SUCCESSFUL
Well done, Traveler 3468, congrats to you and your team.
PROTOCOL OMEGA - Enjoy the 21st
Loved that show, sad it got cancelled. But of all the cancelled shows I’ve seen, this one at least has managed to get an ending that’s not horrible.
What show is this?
I've seen this story.
We get comfortable. Complacent even. People forget the old ways.
Then the machines go wrong and we'll have no idea how to stop them.
Not necessarily a Skynet scenario, but something else that overrides the biosphere worse than we're already doing on our own.
Not sure how this plays into human politics though. There's a strong chance we'll still find a way to launch nukes at each other and end it that way instead.
The most likely scenario is the robots take over and life gets better for a very small percentage of people, the rest of the world/people will live in 3rd world conditions (or worse).
I don’t see why robots would make our life better, minor improvements comparable to the invention of dishwashers aside. Sure, in theory, they could do work, so we don’t have to. But we have seen in the past that productivity gains do not result in less work for us. The problems lie in the way we structured our society and this will not magically change just because we have robots.
You should watch “When the Yogurt Took Over” on Netflix. It’s very short but very entertaining!
Then life is better, crisis averted, more time for other things.
Then people on lemmy will have to find some other topic to doom about. But I have faith in their abilities to solve this problem!
This 100%. The solution problem from Psychology Today:
[The Solution Problem] …reflects a broader psychological dynamic: When solutions become abundant, they start to shape how we perceive the world. They shift our expectations. They narrow our tolerance for discomfort. And sometimes, they create new problems in the act of solving old ones.
Improved QOL doesnt always equal happier populations.
I feel like it was the implied driver for the message given in the ancient scripts written by Biggie Smalls in his rhythmic allegory: “Mo Money Mo Problems.” The increased financial income is implied to be a solution to the controlling share of societal problems, but once a person is living a life with the increased financial income they find the existence of new problems they previously didnt know existed before the solved their financial problems.